One of my favourite genre movies is Tremors (1990) in which a small Texas
town finds itself under threat from a swarm of giant sandworms. It’s a creature
feature but what makes it so good is that director Ron Underwood knows it’s a creature
feature and knows what the audience expects. So he uses all the genre clichés –
or tropes if you’re getting fancy about it – but does so in such a way that
they inform the story rather than inhibit it. The makers of the early Final Destination films did exactly the
same thing.
Which brings us to Skyscraper, the second movie of the summer to star The Rock. Two
Dwayne Johnson movies in one summer – what a time to be alive. Like Tremors, Skyscraper knows its foundation myths and while this is film fairly
and squarely aimed at modern audiences, it has its roots in the past. There are
traces of Seventies disaster movies, there is an obvious nod to Die Hard (1988) and there is even a
passing glance in the direction of Orson Welles epic finale to The Lady from Shanghai (1947). But all
of these improve rather than restrict the storytelling.
Johnson is Will Sawyer a former hostage negotiator
turned security consultant who gets the chance to bid for the job of his life, the
contract for The Pearl. This is the world’s largest building and is as hi-tech
as all get out. Sawyer and his wife Sarah (Neve Campbell) are having the time
of their lives in Hong Kong but, as you would expect, there is a catch.
His erstwhile boss has something that the bad guys
need. It’s a computer drive but, if I’m honest, I’m not sure what it does or why
they need it. Anyway this is our McGuffin and everyone wants to get it. The bad
guys decide the best way to do this is to set fire to the building.
The problem is that his wife and kids are in The Pearl
and while everyone thinks it’s empty Johnson has to get inside the burning
building, ideally around the 100th floor, above the fire line, and save
the day.
That’s it in plot terms. David Mamet says drama
hinges on two things; what does a character want and why does it have to be
now? In screenwriting terms these are known as ‘stakes’ and Johnson’s stakes
are impeccably established. He wants to save his family and he needs to do it
now before they are burned alive.
Skyscraper
pretty much hits the ground running. Johnson’s character is established in a pre-credit
scene in which a situation goes a bit pear-shaped and he ends up losing a leg.
The consequent prosthetic plays a huge part in the rest of the story – Sawyer’s
artificial limb is like Thor’s hammer, Captain America’s shield, and Indiana
Jones’s whip rolled into one.
It’s this level of invention that makes Skyscraper such fun. The plot runs on
train tracks, calamity after calamity is heaped upon our hero and armed only
with his wits, enormous quantities of duct tape, and his trusty prosthetic, Sawyer
has to save the day.
One of the joys of the film is, in these days of over-reliance
on CGI and animation, it relies almost entirely on physical effects. Those are
real stunts with real stunt people and while there is a lot of green screen for
background, there is real physical effort going into this. In addition, the
cinematography by Robert Elswit is superb. Elswit is well known in indie
circles for his work with Paul Thomas Anderson but, as his work on the Mission: Impossible franchise shows he
is something of an action specialist. You can almost feel the heat and smell the
smoke here.
Johnson does what Johnson does, and he does it
very well; he is the right man in the wrong place at the right time. His physicality
is incorporated into the characterisation but even so, the requirements of the role
push him to the limit. And, in keeping with most of his movies, he does not hog
the action. The female characters in his films tend to have a good deal of
agency in the outcome of the story and Neve Campbell is no exception here.
Skyscraper
isn’t perfect, the breadcrumbs in the script are a bit obvious, but it is
tremendous fun and harks back to a simpler cinematic time while at the same time
making the audience gasp with novelty and excitement.
No comments:
Post a Comment