The famous acting coach Sandy Meisner is credited with first coming up with often-quoted saying that ‘acting is
reacting’. What Meisner is suggesting is that actors should be active listeners
during a performance and there is no better listener than Tom Hanks.
At the start of A Beautiful Day in the Neighbourhood, Hanks gives a performance of
almost Zen-like concentration as Fred Rogers, beloved host of Mr Rogers Neighbourhood which for years
was one of America’s favourite TV shows.
If you don’t know who Fred Rogers was I would strongly
recommend the documentary, Won’t You Be
My Neighbour, which is currently on
Netflix. Suffice to say that for hundreds of thousands of Americans from the
late 1960s to the turn of the millennium Mr Rogers was their surrogate friend,
counsellor, parent, and someone they could turn to.
Often when you are dealing with biopics what you
end up with is very good impersonation or imitation like Jamie Foxx in Ray (2004) or Renee Zellweger in Judy (2019). Hanks goes beyond that in
this film; in one of the best performances of a distinguished career he
inhabits Mr Rogers. The opening sequence is almost a note-perfect channelling
of the famous host,
We get the chance to see this because he is not
the subject of the film. The film is based on a famous Esquire magazine article on Rogers by interviewer and feature
writer Tom Junod. He went into the assignment sceptical about Rogers’s inherent
goodness but, as the article makes clear, he became a convert. It’s an extraordinary
read.
In the film Junod is fictionalised as Lloyd Vogel
(Matthew Rhys) a cynical and conflicted journalist who is given the Rogers
assignment almost as a punishment. A new father himself Vogel is beset by
troubles not least his workaholism and his fraught relationship with his own
father (Chris Cooper) who has just re-appeared on the scene.
Vogel is sceptical to the point of outright
opposition to Fred Rogers but as their lives entwine he becomes aware that
maybe it is not the holier than thou act that he had assumed. Since he is not
at the centre of the story we can watch Fred Rogers on the periphery, reacting
for all he’s worth. It’s a remarkable thing to see.
The story is deftly told by Marielle Heller and
the quality of the performances, especially from the leads, draws us in without
being overly sentimental. In a neat move the production design renders moments
from the real world as if they were in Rogers world, thus immersing the
audience more and more into the story.
The potential for schmaltz is high, especially in what
is ostensibly a feelgood finale. However this is undone by an enigmatic final
shot which hints at hidden depths and gives the ending of the film an
unexpected emotional weight.
Hanks is Oscar-nominated for his performance, his
first nomination in 20 years remarkably, in the most competitive Best
Supporting Actor race for years. No one would grudge the statuette going to
Brad Pitt, as expected, but for my money Oscar should be going home with Hanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment